0:00
0:00
The US Casts Its Vote Alongside Russia Against the UN Resolution Condemning the Invasion of Ukraine.
In an unexpected turn of diplomacy, the United States joins Russia in opposing a resolution that mirrors the rising international dissatisfaction with the invasion of Ukraine.
In a notable shift from earlier positions, the United States voted alongside Russia on Monday against a United Nations resolution that condemned Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.
This resolution was viewed as a crucial indicator of global opinion concerning the ongoing conflict as it reached its third year.
Predominantly supported by European countries, the resolution received 93 affirmative votes, 18 against, and 65 abstentions.
The U.S. choice to stand against the resolution in alliance with Russia, Belarus, North Korea, and Sudan reflects a significant change in President Donald Trump’s stance on the Ukraine situation, signaling the end of a previous warming of relations with Russia.
The resolution fundamentally critiqued Russia's actions in Ukraine and highlighted the necessity of upholding Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty.
With rising tensions between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the U.S. proposed an alternative resolution, which has faced backlash from other nations.
France, in particular, sought amendments to the U.S. proposal, insisting that the phrase “full-scale invasion of Ukraine” be included and reaffirming a commitment to Ukraine's territorial sovereignty, which was missing from the U.S. draft.
Supporters of Ukraine, particularly in Europe, expressed their refusal to support the U.S. proposal as it stood, prompting significant amendments.
Hungary, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is among Europe’s most pro-Russian leaders, voted against these amendments.
The final resolution approved by the General Assembly maintained strong language condemning Russia and highlighted the importance of respecting Ukraine's borders, a key component of previous UN resolutions primarily backed by the U.S. during former President Joe Biden's administration.
Just prior to the vote, Dorothy Shea, the U.S. envoy to the UN, remarked, "Neither these amendments nor the resolution proposed by Ukraine will halt the killing. The UN must put an end to the violence," urging all Member States to concentrate on restoring the UN's essential mission of international peace and security.
After the General Assembly's decision, the United States is expected to present its original text to the UN Security Council for a vote later in the day.
A U.S. State Department official indicated that the U.S. would utilize its veto power against any amendments suggested by Russia or European nations.
In accordance with UN regulations, resolutions brought to the Security Council need to obtain a minimum of nine votes from the 15 members and cannot be blocked by any of the five permanent members, which include the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, and China.
Even if the EU members on the Council—France, Slovenia, Denmark, and Greece, alongside the UK—were to abstain, the U.S. resolution could still be approved.
This scenario presents a challenge for France and Britain, potentially forcing them to make difficult decisions about wielding their veto powers for the first time in over thirty years, as their leaders, Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer, are in the U.S. for critical discussions about Ukraine.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has advocated for a peace strategy that fully honors Ukraine's territorial integrity and aligns with the principles set forth in the UN Charter.
This resolution was viewed as a crucial indicator of global opinion concerning the ongoing conflict as it reached its third year.
Predominantly supported by European countries, the resolution received 93 affirmative votes, 18 against, and 65 abstentions.
The U.S. choice to stand against the resolution in alliance with Russia, Belarus, North Korea, and Sudan reflects a significant change in President Donald Trump’s stance on the Ukraine situation, signaling the end of a previous warming of relations with Russia.
The resolution fundamentally critiqued Russia's actions in Ukraine and highlighted the necessity of upholding Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty.
With rising tensions between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the U.S. proposed an alternative resolution, which has faced backlash from other nations.
France, in particular, sought amendments to the U.S. proposal, insisting that the phrase “full-scale invasion of Ukraine” be included and reaffirming a commitment to Ukraine's territorial sovereignty, which was missing from the U.S. draft.
Supporters of Ukraine, particularly in Europe, expressed their refusal to support the U.S. proposal as it stood, prompting significant amendments.
Hungary, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is among Europe’s most pro-Russian leaders, voted against these amendments.
The final resolution approved by the General Assembly maintained strong language condemning Russia and highlighted the importance of respecting Ukraine's borders, a key component of previous UN resolutions primarily backed by the U.S. during former President Joe Biden's administration.
Just prior to the vote, Dorothy Shea, the U.S. envoy to the UN, remarked, "Neither these amendments nor the resolution proposed by Ukraine will halt the killing. The UN must put an end to the violence," urging all Member States to concentrate on restoring the UN's essential mission of international peace and security.
After the General Assembly's decision, the United States is expected to present its original text to the UN Security Council for a vote later in the day.
A U.S. State Department official indicated that the U.S. would utilize its veto power against any amendments suggested by Russia or European nations.
In accordance with UN regulations, resolutions brought to the Security Council need to obtain a minimum of nine votes from the 15 members and cannot be blocked by any of the five permanent members, which include the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, and China.
Even if the EU members on the Council—France, Slovenia, Denmark, and Greece, alongside the UK—were to abstain, the U.S. resolution could still be approved.
This scenario presents a challenge for France and Britain, potentially forcing them to make difficult decisions about wielding their veto powers for the first time in over thirty years, as their leaders, Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer, are in the U.S. for critical discussions about Ukraine.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has advocated for a peace strategy that fully honors Ukraine's territorial integrity and aligns with the principles set forth in the UN Charter.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
