Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has consistently showcased his ability to adapt politically, presenting various personas tailored to his audience.

Domestically, he casts himself as a steadfast protector of the Serbian nation.

In Brussels and Washington, he assumes the role of a pragmatic leader, whereas in Moscow, he highlights solidarity as a ‘Slavic brother.’ This balancing act has reinforced his dominance in Serbian politics, despite criticism from domestic foes and international observers.

This week, Vučić encounters heightened scrutiny following a tragic event in Novi Sad, where the collapse of a railway station roof resulted in the deaths of fifteen people.

Public outrage has centered on allegations of systemic corruption, believed to have played a role in the disaster.

In response to growing protests, including unprecedented involvement from student groups, Vučić proposed an 'advisory referendum' on his presidency.

He promised to resign if the vote opposed him, a bold maneuver intended to ease tensions.

However, critics claim that elections during Vučić’s reign lack true competition.

Independent observers, such as Serbia's CRTA NGO, have highlighted ongoing concerns about electoral fairness and media freedom.

Some have even likened the situation to the era of Slobodan Milošević, under whom Vučić previously served.

Despite internal dissatisfaction, Vučić maintains strong relations with the European Union.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen commended his dedication to reforms during a visit to Belgrade in October, noting progress in rule of law and democracy.

Yet, opposition leaders and civil society groups remain doubtful, accusing the president of consolidating power at the cost of institutional independence.

The issue of Kosovo continues to be a key element in Vučić’s political narrative, often acting as a rallying point for nationalist sentiment.

While this strategy resonates with some voters, it has also been criticized for diverting attention from urgent economic and governance concerns.

As protests progress and international focus intensifies, Vučić’s ability to manage these challenges will likely depend on his skill in balancing the conflicting demands of domestic politics and international diplomacy.

For now, his theatrical approach to governance continues to dominate Serbia’s political scene, garnering both praise and criticism on the world stage.